Constructivist and emotivist¶
Constructivist / Emotivist is one of the 15 Reinin dichotomies <reinin_dich>.
Constructivist and emotivist types¶
Typical characteristics¶
Constructivist¶
Tend to minimize the emotional elements of interaction, preferring to focus on the ‘business’ elements.
Have emotional ‘anchors’ (eg, books, films, places) which they use to support their internal emotional state.
Can become ‘emotionally hooked’, and can have a strong reaction to a particular part or section regardless of their feelings towards the entirety.
Have greater difficulty disassociating from others’ emotions and experiences than from requests for action or consideration.
I prefer when people offer concrete solutions instead of comfort or sympathy.
Emotivist¶
Tend to concentrate foremost on the emotional background of interaction, with ‘business’ a secondary concern.
Prefer the new and novel over the old and known.
Information perceived as unprofessional or low-quality can leave them indifferent.
Have greater difficulty disassociating from requests for action or consideration than from others’ emotions and experiences.
If a conversation is emotionally negative, I consider it wasted.
Extended characteristics¶
Taken from 2003 study of Reinin traits <reinin_study>.
Constructivists¶
In contact with other people, constructivist types try to reduce or completely avoid any stages of emotional contact (to “skip” it). They do not consider overall emotional attitude as a necessary element of interaction (in interaction, they discuss or do something together, not always emotionally “re-adjusting”)
For the constructivist emotional “anchors” are important (connected to a certain place, book, movie, etc.) which resonate with their internal emotional condition. With the help of such anchors, they hold onto or strengthen their inner emotional state. They are inclined to re-reed a book or to visit the same place again just to go through the emotions connected with that place.
They can get “emotionally hooked”, experience strong emotions regardless of whether they like the overall quality of material presented (for example, they may dislike a movie as a whole but laugh or cry during a single scene from it).
They disassociate themselves from other’s emotions and worries with greater difficulty than from requests to do or think over something.
Emotivists¶
In interaction with other people, they try to get them into the “correct” emotional state (or readjust themselves). In interaction they are drawn into the overall emotional orientation (they distinguish communication and relating as a separate type of activityas “immersion into the atmosphere”). While discussing some matter, an emotivist may “wander off” away from the subject and “go off” on an emotional exchange.
Emotivists would rather prefer new impressions than returning to something already lived through, an old experience (even if its emotionally pleasant). They will re-read a book or revisit the same place in cases they have forgotten something or in hopes of finding something new.
Information (for example, book, movie, excursion) perceived as presented unprofessionally, of “poor quality”, does not provoke the emotivist emotionally but leaves them indifferent.
They distance themselves form requests of others to do or consider something with greater difficulty than from emotions and worries of others.
Hypotheses
Constructivists less critically receive emotions, they get “loaded” by them. After falling into a particular emotional state, constructivists stay in it for a prolonged period of time, therefore they try to avoid information that is unacceptable or unpleasant for them emotionally. For emotivists calls for action/consideration are not critically evaluated, thus they can get “loaded” by them and switch to thinking about a certain topic. After getting into a theme they stay in that mode of operation for a prolonged period of time and have difficulty switching, “disconnecting” (due to this they try to avoid unacceptable requests/topics).
Examples
Constructivists: “I try to reduce emotional contact. I always start with a set of automatic responses (give slippers, pour some tea or coffee…)” “If somebody has come for a shoulder to cry on I generally know what to do” “It is so much easier to come into contact over some objective matter (interaction by pertaining to the matter at hand)” “I prefer when people offer me concrete solutions to my problemsit is better than consolations” “If I wish to help, then of course by action. Very rarely I call just to inquire how things are going. I track moods in parallel” “I listen to music depending on my mood” “I will re-read the whole book for specific paragraphs… What does it mean “poorly written”? It stirs methat’s what’s important” “I drive over to the same place, it’s as if I’m visiting my home” “I try not to see movies that I know are emotionally heavy. I won’t watch them over again most certainly” “I can worry for people for a long time, even those whom I casually met” “The first time you watch a comedy is to laughafter that it’s to relive these experiences”.
Emotivist: “First of all, I attempt to create a comfortable psychological atmosphere. I try to direct new people into the situation, “build bridges”, help them “accommodate” so that they feel at ease” “I strike up new contacts with words, not actions” “If emotional atmosphere of an interaction is negative I consider the conversation “wasted” (unsuccessful)” “Before a dialogue I as if check the emotional states of people involved and try to positively orient them” “It’s easier to change the emotional background” “I can talk about various things that I don’t believe in or have no interest in simply “for the spirit” of the conversation” “I need new experiences so I am likely to visit a new place. If I return, then I return to a place where “the road has changed” since I last visited” “I won’t watch a movie that was poorly directed. Poorly written book doesn’t stir and involve me” “I’ll re-read a book if I have forgotten the storyline” “If I’m asked to consider/do something what I’ll most remember is the act of request itself”.
Additional Commentary and Notes¶
See also: Sociotypograph determine your sociotype by Renin dichotomies.
Constructivists
Constructivists try to get into the right mindset for an activity and it takes time for them to get from one mindset to another. When they are at home, they are mentally prepared for anything that could happen at home and when they are at work, they switch over to work-mentality. They can get overwhelmed by emotions because once they get into an emotional state, they stay in that emotional state for a long time. Constructivists avoid emotional contact with others and they don’t think it’s necessary to adjust to the conversation emotionally. They use automatic polite responses and customs, like starting with “how are you?” or offering their guests coffee or tea. Practical conversation (talking “business”) is easier for them. They like to repeat emotional states - rereading books, watching movies that they have already seen and revisiting places they liked. They avoid movies, situations and people who give them a negative mindset, because they have a difficult time getting rid of that mindset. Constructivists use emotional anchors (carefully chosen music, books, movies) to keep or strengthen their internal emotional state.
Emotivists
Emotivists try to enter the emotional atmosphere of the conversation and they try to keep the emotion in the conversation positive. They can talk about various things they have no interest in or do not believe in simply for the sake of maintaining a “positive spirit”. Talking business is more difficult and the conversation topic can wander off into emotional exchange. They try to get new experiences and new emotions, which is why they travel to new places and rarely watch movies they have already seen. In emotivists calls for action/requests are not critically estimated and because of it they can get overwhelmed by them. After getting into a theme they stay in that mode of operation for a prolonged period of time and have difficulty switching, “disconnecting” (and because of it try to avoid unpleasant requests).
Examples
In forum conversations when a person asks a question, emotivists reply with conversational posts trying to find out what caused such a question and trying to see if they can make the person feel better. They can also include an answer to the question, but that’s secondary. Constructivists give as good of an answer as they can to help find a solution. They might also include a question about why the question was asked by this particular person, but only when they are curious about it. It’s not important for the thread (conversation) itself.
Constructivists don’t mind seeing a movie that they have already seen, but emotivists would only do that if there might be some new information that they missed the first time or if they have forgotten a lot about the movie. Constructivists might prefer re-watching a movie that gave them a good emotion to seeing something brand new that they don’t know if they’ll like. This is because constructivists have inert ethics and it’s difficult to get rid of the wrong emotional state, but emotivists have contact ethics so they want to experience new emotions.
Theoretical properties of constructivist and emotivist types¶
Constructivist/emotivist corresponds with the inert/ contact dichotomy for rational <ration_irration> information elements <elements>:
The constructivist types have contact logic and inert ethics.
The emotivist types have contact ethics and inert logic.